Last week Facebook launched Places, a service that allows users to check-in to specific locations and feed that information into their stream. But that’s Foursquare, you say. Yes. But the difference is that Foursquare has mayors, Places has 500 million citizens.
Until now, location apps like Foursquare and Gowalla were adopted by a pretty narrow niche. Either you were in or you were out. Places now puts location tagging squarely in front of the average social user in the world’s most trafficked social platform.
A few thoughts:
Places will have a different role. I’m interested to see if and how Places becomes integrated among Facebook users. I think the absence of the mayorship nonsense will force the social marketplace to think about how they want to use location tracking. How can identifying your location bring value to the average personal network?
I anticipate a honeymoon period of requisite experimentation. Places will then settle in as a glorified status update for select circumstances. I’m guessing I’ll reserve Places for remarkable events and places that may have real meaning for people who follow me. Knowing that I’m drinking Coffee at Starbucks or shopping at Ace Hardware isn’t likely to help people understand me or want to connect to me.
Within the core of hardcore Foursquare and Gowalla users we all came to tolerate the inane. It was part of the game. It was interesting to watch and even more interesting to think through its potential applications. Facebook’s adoption will serve as something of an experiment with the average social user. I suspect that banal geoupdate will become an embarrassing part of social’s history.
Location has become a commodity. Places makes location functionality no longer a novelty. In fact, as of last week, it’s official: location tagging is old news. And checking in alone won’t create the value necessary to drive broad adoption. It’s what Facebook plans to do to incent participation that will make it or break it.
Expect derivative effect for Foursquare and Gowalla. If Places gains any traction expect there to be a drafting effect on Facebook and Gowalla. Curiosity with location may drive interest in mayorship among the vast population of those who have never heard of Foursquare. I don’t expect Foursquare and Gowalla to be going anywhere soon.
Location features may offer professional value. Location tagging can serve a very specific service in telling and selling your expertise. It’s clear from watching my professional contacts on LinkedIn that location serves to tell a lot about who you are. I find it valuable to see what my peers are up to in their work. It helps me to understand how they work and what they do.
I’ve also noticed in my network that geotracking’s biggest critics are the first to advertise their specific location on Twitter when it serves to tell the world about their involvement on a panel or involvement in a particularly sexy meeting of influentials. Only in the social media space is hypocry eclipsed by vanity.
Transparency will set you free – or maybe not. The Church of Facebook believes that the truth will set us free. The more we know about one another the more we will be forced to face the music of our own actions. While the Facebook ideology never referred to health and individual responsibility, there may be something to it.
So that leads me to think that location-based services like Places can serve some very specific roles concerning health. While theoretical privacy concerns are the target of criticism, I think an understanding of location may have real power in understanding the relationship between variables like where we hang and our predisposition for chronic disease. Let’s see if Facebook is interested in the health outcomes business.
Finally, check out Facebook’s Places promotional clip on YouTube.
Beyond the desperately global feel to the vid, what struck me was the image of the family at the table with the voiceover stating, “I expect in the future a lot of people will share their lives this way.” Just at that moment the father feeds the child. Chilling in a strange way – but then again that comes from someone raised with a rotary phone.
Facebook sees itself as the next generation’s global platform for communication with the same impact as the invention of the telephone. Places is just another step in that direction.




{ 2 comments }
Great first thoughts on Places, Bryan.
It will be interesting to see how it evolves (right now there’s issues with tagging people, so that they appear to be a places they’re not).
But another question about location-based streaming: do these services truly bring people together IRL/AFK, or do they only serve to reinforce digital connectivity?
To me, the paradox of Foursquare is that as people check-in, the check-ins are typically just that: check-ins. They aren’t always actions that resulted in face-to-face encounters (sometimes they do – I’ve had a couple experiences where I was able to catch up with old friends because of a check-in).
What I mean is: the more reliant we become on technology to connect with each other, what do we end up connecting with: each other, or the technology that tells us we’re connected with each other?
I don’t know. I guess we’ll just have to see what the world’s largest social experiment reveals over the next few years and decades.
All I can say is: let’s hope that we create designs and conditions where technology empowers us, not the other way around.
@PhilBaumann
Good thoughts here Bryan. I think the potential Places has is incredible, simply because it could be in 500 million places at any instant. I think the lack of a game is important to adoption of new services like Foursquare and Gowalla, but outside of the hardcore users, a game alone isn’t enough to create habitual use. What Places is really lacking at launch is what Foursquare has really exploded with: collaboration with business. True value isn’t mayorship, it’s what mayorship brings. They could have made you Jedi, but you’d play anyway because there’s value in free stuff (sorry to Skywalker fans). Value is the ability to know what else I may be interested in (food) now that I have checked in to the Austin airport. Businesses are key to adoption, b/c it’s a layer of value that will take pages to a new level. Especially in a relationship economy.