• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

33 Charts

  • About
    • What is 33 Charts?
    • Bryan Vartabedian MD
  • Blog
  • 33mail
  • Foci
    • Social/Public Media
    • Physicians
    • Patients
    • Hospitals
    • Information
    • Process/Flow
    • Technology
    • Digital culture
    • Future Medicine
  • The Public Physician
Physicians, Social/Public Media

Should Academics Publish Anonymously?

December 9, 2013 By Bryan Vartabedian · Reading Time: 2 minutes

If you can, have a peek at New Threats to Academic Freedom published in the November issue of Bioethics.  The author, Francesca Minerva, argues that anonymity might represent a way to shield academics from the repercussions of public dialog when discussing sensitive matters.  Academic freedom, she suggests, is a key element in sustaining the mindset for creativity and productivity.  An example of death threats following an ethical debate of post-term abortion is cited as one example of why author anonymity might be necessary to protect authors.

eye of spy, web cam behind a paper holeThe paper is remarkable in that it illustrates the separation some academics perceive between themselves and the networked world.

A couple of points:

Anonymity is a fantasy.  While it might seem to offer a convenient solution to the repercussion of our beliefs, anonymity in public dialog is unsustainable and should be seen as a dying vestige of analog life.

We’re part of a global conversation.  The walls dividing ‘the academic thinker’ and the rest of the world have begun their decay.  Our dialog is no longer sequestered.  One could even argue that we even share an obligation to involve ourselves in the broader discourse.  While I can personally appreciate the difficulties of public dialog surrounding controversial issues, this is what we do.  Or it’s now what we should do.

Avoidance of public controversy is unavoidable.  There are few subjects of academic investigation free from controversy.  The example of post-term abortion represents an an issue so volatile that no measure of ‘protection,’ even the perception of anonymity, is possible.

Risk must be balanced with opportunity.  While I’m no stranger to menacing trolls, the benefits outweigh the real personal risk of public discussion.  And to separate ourselves from our ideas is to miss the opportunity that comes with this type of public discourse.  The true cost of remaining anonymous, according to Google’s Eric Schmidt, may be irrelevance.

While the subject of this paper would be great for all of us to discuss, it is ironically sequestered within the confines of an involuting 17th century information distribution model (journal).  Of course, for an author concerned with implications of public discourse, perhaps it’s better that way.

Sarcasm aside, this is an interesting read with lots to discuss.  For those of you privileged enough to see this author’s thinking, where have I gone wrong?

Links to Amazon represent affiliate links.

Related Articles

  • Chinese Public Physicians Gone Wild
  • Public Thinking is Good
  • Social Media Has Been Introduced to Physicians

Tagged With: Anonymity

Related Articles

  • Chinese Public Physicians Gone Wild
  • Public Thinking is Good
  • Social Media Has Been Introduced to Physicians

Primary Sidebar

Bryan Vartabedian, MD

Bryan Vartabedian, MD
Bryan Vartabedian is the Chief Pediatrics Officer at Texas Children’s Hospital North Austin and one of health care’s influential
voices on technology & medicine.
Learn More

Popular Articles

  • The Fate of Fired Cleveland Clinic Resident Lara Kollab
  • Cures Act Final Rule – How It Will Change Medicine
  • 12 Things About Doximity You Probably Didn’t Know
  • Should Physicians Give Their Cell Phone Number to Patients?
  • Doximity Dialer Video – Telemedicine’s Latest Power Player

Sign up for 33mail newsletter

Featured Articles

Yes, Doctor

Health Care and the Visibility-Value Continuum

Reactive and Creative Spaces

Doctors and the Endemic Culture of Permission

Context Collapse and the Public Physician

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Footer

What is 33 Charts?

With a mashup of curated and original content that crosses the spaces of digital health, media, communication, technology, patient experience, digital culture, and the humanities, 33 charts offers unique insight and analysis on the changing face of medicine.

Founded in 2009 as a center of community and thought leadership for the issues doctors face in a digital world, 33 charts was included in the National Library of Medicine permanent web archive in 2014.
Learn More

Foci

  • Digital culture
  • Digital Health
  • EHR/Health IT
  • Future Medicine
  • Hospitals
  • Information
  • Patients
  • Physicians
  • Process/Flow
  • Quality
  • Social/Public Media
  • Technology

Copyright © 2023 · 33 Charts · Privacy Policy