• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

33 Charts

  • About
    • What is 33 Charts?
    • Bryan Vartabedian MD
  • Blog
  • 33mail
  • Foci
    • Social/Public Media
    • Physicians
    • Patients
    • Hospitals
    • Information
    • Process/Flow
    • Technology
    • Digital culture
    • Future Medicine
  • The Public Physician
Uncategorized

The Problem with Casual Medical Advice

February 1, 2011 By Bryan Vartabedian · Reading Time: < 1 minutes

It’s happening more frequently:  Requests for medical advice by email.  The more I do, the more people I meet.  The network grows and friends of friends learn about what I do.

So junior has a little pain and shows at the local ER where the requisite CT shows a little thickening of the ileum.  Someone suggests that the family drop me a line.  Here’s the problem:  There’s more to this than digital correspondence will allow.

While the statistical reality of this child’s situation is that this finding represents a little edema from a virus, the differential is precarious: crohn’s disease, lymphoma, tuberculous ileitis, eosinophilic enteropathy.

A case of this type requires the thorough exploration of a child’s story and a compulsive exam that takes into consideration the problems in the differential.  Worrisome considerations need to be framed and discussed in the context of the child’s total presentation and real likelihood of occurrence.  The sensitive dialog surrounding our diagnostic approach to this child requires a relationship.  And the various approaches require an element of negotiation with the family.  All of this takes time, emotional intelligence and good clinical judgment.

Children are complicated creatures.  Parents are more complicated.  Loose, off-the-cuff advice based on shotty information shortchanges both parties.

Of course the easiest response to these regular queries is that my employer, malpractice carrier, and the Texas State Board preclude offering medical advice without an established relationship or the maintenance of a medical record available for peer review.  Everybody understands legalese.  Few, however, understand the complexity of a properly executed medical encounter.

Related Articles

  • Medical Apocalypse
  • Medical Foo
  • (How) Should Patients be Present at Medical Meetings?

Tagged With: Patients

Related Articles

  • Medical Apocalypse
  • Medical Foo
  • (How) Should Patients be Present at Medical Meetings?

Primary Sidebar

Bryan Vartabedian, MD

Bryan Vartabedian, MD
Bryan Vartabedian is the Chief Pediatrics Officer at Texas Children’s Hospital North Austin and one of health care’s influential
voices on technology & medicine.
Learn More

Popular Articles

  • The Fate of Fired Cleveland Clinic Resident Lara Kollab
  • Cures Act Final Rule – How It Will Change Medicine
  • 12 Things About Doximity You Probably Didn’t Know
  • Should Physicians Give Their Cell Phone Number to Patients?
  • Doximity Dialer Video – Telemedicine’s Latest Power Player

Sign up for 33mail newsletter

Featured Articles

Doctors and the Endemic Culture of Permission

Health Care and the Visibility-Value Continuum

Context Collapse and the Public Physician

The Case for New Physician Literacies in the Digital Age

Yes, Doctor

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Footer

What is 33 Charts?

With a mashup of curated and original content that crosses the spaces of digital health, media, communication, technology, patient experience, digital culture, and the humanities, 33 charts offers unique insight and analysis on the changing face of medicine.

Founded in 2009 as a center of community and thought leadership for the issues doctors face in a digital world, 33 charts was included in the National Library of Medicine permanent web archive in 2014.
Learn More

Foci

  • Digital culture
  • Digital Health
  • EHR/Health IT
  • Future Medicine
  • Hospitals
  • Information
  • Patients
  • Physicians
  • Process/Flow
  • Quality
  • Social/Public Media
  • Technology

Copyright © 2023 · 33 Charts · Privacy Policy