• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

33 Charts

  • About
    • What is 33 Charts?
    • Bryan Vartabedian MD
  • Blog
  • 33mail
  • Foci
    • Social/Public Media
    • Physicians
    • Patients
    • Hospitals
    • Information
    • Process/Flow
    • Technology
    • Digital culture
    • Future Medicine
  • The Public Physician
Uncategorized

Restricted Networks and Email Dominate Physician Sharing

September 8, 2011 By Bryan Vartabedian · Reading Time: 2 minutes

Last fall I banded together with a small group of colleagues to learn a little more about how doctors us social media.  When you look at doctors and their social practices you might find a few categories of interaction:  Doctor to patient, doctor to patient population and doctor to doctor.  We thought it would be interesting to drill down on this last category and ask how doctors are using social media to share information with one another.

So we put together a study that specifically looked at oncologists and primary care doctors with attention to the tools used and the factors that might predict their intention to put them to use.  Our data went public August 15th and we’ll formally present our findings at the Medicine 2.0 Congress at Stanford next week.  You can burrow through some of what we learned here on the Medicine 2.0 site.

There’s lot’s to talk about and over the next couple of weeks I intend to focus on some of the specific finding and what they may represent.

I thought this was interesting:  When it comes to sharing information with other doctors, facilitated networks and email still seem to rule the day.  Video, blogs, real-time micro-blogging, and wikis be damned, it seems doctors prefer to circle the wagons in tight MD verticals or keep it one-to-one/few on email.  70% of physicians in our study use email for professional sharing of information and 50% use facilitated networks like Sermo, Doximity, and Physician Connect.  We found that 7% of PCPs and oncologists use Twitter to share amongst themselves.  This figure is consistent with Twitter adoption by the general American public.

To me this isn’t surprising based on what I see and hear from my colleagues.  What isn’t clear is whether physicians truly prefer closed networks and email or is it that they’ve yet to try and judge the utility of other platforms (I’ll put my money on the latter).  I suspect that if we were to look more specifically at the type of content shared doctor-to-doctor we might find that physicians ‘profile’ platforms for different types of sharing.

Let me know what you think.  Better yet, tell us what you think by joining Brian McGowan, Molly Wasko, Bob Miller and myself at the Medicine 2.0 Congress at Stanford on September 17th.  The mikes will be open and we’re looking for a lively discussion.

Related Articles

  • Should Physician Social Networks Include Chiropractors?
  • Are Doctors Liable for Comments on Physician Social Networks?
  • How Many Social Neighborhoods Can a Doctor Have?

Related Articles

  • Should Physician Social Networks Include Chiropractors?
  • Are Doctors Liable for Comments on Physician Social Networks?
  • How Many Social Neighborhoods Can a Doctor Have?

Primary Sidebar

Bryan Vartabedian, MD

Bryan Vartabedian, MD
Bryan Vartabedian is the Chief Pediatrics Officer at Texas Children’s Hospital North Austin and one of health care’s influential
voices on technology & medicine.
Learn More

Popular Articles

  • The Fate of Fired Cleveland Clinic Resident Lara Kollab
  • Cures Act Final Rule – How It Will Change Medicine
  • 12 Things About Doximity You Probably Didn’t Know
  • Should Physicians Give Their Cell Phone Number to Patients?
  • Doximity Dialer Video – Telemedicine’s Latest Power Player

Sign up for 33mail newsletter

Featured Articles

Health Care and the Visibility-Value Continuum

Reactive and Creative Spaces

Context Collapse and the Public Physician

Doctors and social media: Damned if you engage, damned if you don’t

100,000 Connected Lemmings

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Footer

What is 33 Charts?

With a mashup of curated and original content that crosses the spaces of digital health, media, communication, technology, patient experience, digital culture, and the humanities, 33 charts offers unique insight and analysis on the changing face of medicine.

Founded in 2009 as a center of community and thought leadership for the issues doctors face in a digital world, 33 charts was included in the National Library of Medicine permanent web archive in 2014.
Learn More

Foci

  • Digital culture
  • Digital Health
  • EHR/Health IT
  • Future Medicine
  • Hospitals
  • Information
  • Patients
  • Physicians
  • Process/Flow
  • Quality
  • Social/Public Media
  • Technology

Copyright © 2023 · 33 Charts · Privacy Policy