• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

33 Charts

  • About
    • What is 33 Charts?
    • Bryan Vartabedian MD
  • Blog
  • 33mail
  • Foci
    • Social/Public Media
    • Physicians
    • Patients
    • Hospitals
    • Information
    • Process/Flow
    • Technology
    • Digital culture
    • Future Medicine
  • The Public Physician
Digital Health, Process/Flow

Slow Medicine – Should Healthcare be Inconvenient?

September 19, 2018 By Bryan Vartabedian · Reading Time: 3 minutes

slow medicineShould healthcare be inconvenient by design? And should slow medicine be the default option in some circumstances?

Slow medicine is a movement calling for change in medical practice which is inspired by the slow food movement. “Like for the slow food movement, slow medicine is a call to balance over-emphasis on fast processes which reduce quality.”

But real-time person-to-person connection is the way we operate. And it’s bleeding in to patient care. Text-based communication allows us to access healthcare at the speed of now. In some circumstances these technologies are a helpful in improving communication.

But there may be a good reason why focused deep dive encounters have a role. There may be a place for slightly inconvenient healthcare.

How health professionals remember their patients

Consider what happens in my clinic. My nurse Andrea asks me a question about a particular patient with celiac disease. I have many patients with celiac disease. So I ask, ‘Remind me, who is this again?’

What I’m really asking is, ‘give me some context so that I can recall the specifics of this child.’ So she goes on and typically tells me a story about the mother or the child. Not a long story, but something unique about their problem.

Then it comes together. But even after I remember the specific patient in question we hover together over the chart to recall the specifics of the evaluation we’ve done to date.

At that point I’ve been pulled into that patient’s orbit, so to speak. For me it’s when I have full awareness of their situation coupled with my focused attention. It’s a state of mindfulness. My capacity for shaping a meaningful solution tailored to their unique story at that point is exponentially bigger.

Then consider what happens on call when Andrea isn’t around. A mother pages me and opens up the discussion, “Brianna’s having another one of her episodes…” As if I immediately remember Brianna and the details of her episodes from 8 weeks earlier. In some circustances I do remember Brianna. But when I do the details are likely fuzzy. With details that I draw from a few very specific and diplomatically placed questions I can put the story together and remember the sequence of Brianna’s most recent course.

Slow medicine makes sense in certain circumstances

Enter real-time connection applications that offer immediate answers. You can see the problem here. De novo messages are unlikely to draw meaningful answers without catch up and context. In the media you would think that this is the answer to our prayers. Quick healthcare when we need it.

Of course, once I’m activated and engaged in a problem it’s a different situation. If something has happened during a weekend on call and we’ve had that conversation or ER visit a quick exchange by text makes sense. Follow-up questions, quick hits, prescription questions all make sense around an episode of care.

Despite Silicon Valley self-interests pressing us to see new forms of media as the core way to connect, different circumstances call for different kinds of connection with a health professional. Text, phone call, teleconnection, and IRL visits are all have their place in the care delivery continuum.

And some of these types of connection of course, are more convenient than others. I wrote about this dilemma in The Problem with Human Communication.

Inconvenient healthcare can sometimes trump convenience

While I’ve been an advocate for tech-mediated access to care, there‘s something to the occasional deep dive. Chart open and and attention transfixed, a time and place to catch-up and drill down. Convenience is good, but a careful connection from time-to-time trumps convenience.

Inconvenient healthcare, it seems, may have its place.

Image modified via the National Library of Medicine. This post was an inspired pivot from Seth Godin’s Education Needs to Be Inconvenient.

Related Articles

  • Kidney Boy and the Slow Shift of Medicine
  • What Can Healthcare Learn From Amazon?
  • One Button Medicine

Tagged With: Slow Medicine

Related Articles

  • Kidney Boy and the Slow Shift of Medicine
  • What Can Healthcare Learn From Amazon?
  • One Button Medicine

Primary Sidebar

Bryan Vartabedian, MD

Bryan Vartabedian, MD
Bryan Vartabedian is the Chief Pediatrics Officer at Texas Children’s Hospital North Austin and one of health care’s influential
voices on technology & medicine.
Learn More

Popular Articles

  • The Fate of Fired Cleveland Clinic Resident Lara Kollab
  • Cures Act Final Rule – How It Will Change Medicine
  • 12 Things About Doximity You Probably Didn’t Know
  • Should Physicians Give Their Cell Phone Number to Patients?
  • Doximity Dialer Video – Telemedicine’s Latest Power Player

Sign up for 33mail newsletter

Featured Articles

Reactive and Creative Spaces

The Case for New Physician Literacies in the Digital Age

The Rise of Medicine’s Creative Class

100,000 Connected Lemmings

Context Collapse and the Public Physician

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Footer

What is 33 Charts?

With a mashup of curated and original content that crosses the spaces of digital health, media, communication, technology, patient experience, digital culture, and the humanities, 33 charts offers unique insight and analysis on the changing face of medicine.

Founded in 2009 as a center of community and thought leadership for the issues doctors face in a digital world, 33 charts was included in the National Library of Medicine permanent web archive in 2014.
Learn More

Foci

  • Digital culture
  • Digital Health
  • EHR/Health IT
  • Future Medicine
  • Hospitals
  • Information
  • Patients
  • Physicians
  • Process/Flow
  • Quality
  • Social/Public Media
  • Technology

Copyright © 2023 · 33 Charts · Privacy Policy