• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

33 Charts

  • About
    • What is 33 Charts?
    • Bryan Vartabedian MD
  • Blog
  • 33mail
  • Foci
    • Social/Public Media
    • Physicians
    • Patients
    • Hospitals
    • Information
    • Process/Flow
    • Technology
    • Digital culture
    • Future Medicine
  • The Public Physician
Uncategorized

When Young Doctors Lie

July 29, 2010 By Bryan Vartabedian · Reading Time: 2 minutes

This is something:  A study published in the July 20, 2010 Annals of Internal Medicine finds that 5% of residency applications contain plagiarized content.  The study from Boston’s Brigham & Woman’s Hospital is based on the personal statements of nearly 5,000 residency applicants that were matched against a database of published content.

The authors comment that the study is limited, among other things, by the fact that it was done in just one institution.  It makes me wonder if the number is artificially high or potentially too low.

So why would medical students lie?

It’s the era of digital reverberation. Perhaps we’re seeing the digital youth coming of age.  Take unbridled access to the worldwide database of human content and couple that with the capacity to cut-and-past and you’ve got a recipe for reverberation.  Just look at the blogosphere.

Ignorance is bliss. While a sorry excuse, perhaps they don’t know better.  There’s the sad reality that subtle forms of plagiarism have become the standard for students beginning at the secondary level.  It’s conceivable that there’s a growing population that doesn’t see this type of ‘borrowing’ as a problem.

Competition. Throw in a little competition (on top of shifting norms and ignorance) and the temptation is greater.  The study found that plagiarized content was more common non-U.S. trained applicants where the demands for a sharp application are all the higher.  The Brigham, incidentally, is a Harvard institution.

And maybe this is nothing new.  Perhaps this kind of behavior has been in play since the dawn of medical residency.  Technology may now have allowed the exposure of a problem not unique to this generation of doctors.

I don’t have the answer to this one except that education regarding what constitutes unethical academic conduct has to begin early in the educational process.  As the father of an 11-year-old who has already begun accessing the web for projects, I can see cut-and-paste easily evolving as a way of life for the next generation.

So if you’re a medical school or residency applicant keep in mind that big brother is watching and his ability to identify academic fraud will only get better.  And if you have ideas that aren’t original, you best keep ‘em to yourself.

Related Articles

  • Online Doctors
  • Why Content Creation is Important for Doctors
  • Pay-for-Post Doctors

Related Articles

  • Online Doctors
  • Why Content Creation is Important for Doctors
  • Pay-for-Post Doctors

Primary Sidebar

Bryan Vartabedian, MD

Bryan Vartabedian, MD
Bryan Vartabedian is the Chief Pediatrics Officer at Texas Children’s Hospital North Austin and one of health care’s influential
voices on technology & medicine.
Learn More

Popular Articles

  • The Fate of Fired Cleveland Clinic Resident Lara Kollab
  • Cures Act Final Rule – How It Will Change Medicine
  • 12 Things About Doximity You Probably Didn’t Know
  • Should Physicians Give Their Cell Phone Number to Patients?
  • Doximity Dialer Video – Telemedicine’s Latest Power Player

Sign up for 33mail newsletter

Featured Articles

Doctors and social media: Damned if you engage, damned if you don’t

100,000 Connected Lemmings

The Rise of Medicine’s Creative Class

The Case for New Physician Literacies in the Digital Age

Context Collapse and the Public Physician

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Footer

What is 33 Charts?

With a mashup of curated and original content that crosses the spaces of digital health, media, communication, technology, patient experience, digital culture, and the humanities, 33 charts offers unique insight and analysis on the changing face of medicine.

Founded in 2009 as a center of community and thought leadership for the issues doctors face in a digital world, 33 charts was included in the National Library of Medicine permanent web archive in 2014.
Learn More

Foci

  • Digital culture
  • Digital Health
  • EHR/Health IT
  • Future Medicine
  • Hospitals
  • Information
  • Patients
  • Physicians
  • Process/Flow
  • Quality
  • Social/Public Media
  • Technology

Copyright © 2023 · 33 Charts · Privacy Policy