• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

33 Charts

  • About
    • What is 33 Charts?
    • Bryan Vartabedian MD
  • Blog
  • 33mail
  • Foci
    • Social/Public Media
    • Physicians
    • Patients
    • Hospitals
    • Information
    • Process/Flow
    • Technology
    • Digital culture
    • Future Medicine
  • The Public Physician
Patients

Phronesis: Do Patients Have Clinical Judgment?

January 11, 2011 By Bryan Vartabedian · Reading Time: 2 minutes

I used to think they didn’t but they do.

Clinical judgment is the application of individual experience to the variables of a patient’s medical presentation.  It’s the hard worn skill of knowing what to do and how far to go in a particular situation.  It’s having the confidence to do nothing.  Clinical judgment is learned from seeing lots of sick people.  Good clinical judgment is when the gifted capacity of reasoning intersects with experience.  Some doctors have better judgment than others.

Aristotle called this phronesis – or practical judgment.

Patients have practical judgment.  We often can tell when something’s amiss with our own body.  Things feel different or look different.  Taking action on these observations is how we exercise judgment as patients.

Parents of children with central venous lines, for example, can often identify the early signs of infection before fever has ever appeared.  They know the subtleties of their child’s behavior.  The same goes for children with epilepsy.  People with diabetes increasingly have the latitude to apply judgment to the management of their disease.  This tends to be quite defined, however, with fixed variables and limited options for intervention.

I’ve always known that patients have clinical judgment but I never recognized it as such.  When I talk about ‘listening to a patient’ I am usually referring to the dialog about their strangest fears, questions, concerns and theories – I want to hear their introspection.  This dialog reveals hidden agendas and clues that can be critical diagnostically or in the execution of treatment.  I can’t prove it but I’m convinced it improves adherence.

The problem with the application of broader clinical judgment to our personal situations is that is that we aren’t always objective.  Fear and denial dangerously influence our decision-making.

Take me, for example.  My judgment with my own children is suspect.  I function beautifully as a parent.  But when it comes to the hard decision of when to draw the therapeutic line, I still think like a parent.  My fear is likely to get in the way.  With respect to ourselves or family members, acting solely on our own clinical judgment isn’t advisable in most cases.

But irrespective of how it’s exercised, patient judgment is ultimately important.  It must be respected and factored into the decision-making that takes place between provider and patient.

I had never really thought about it before: Patient phronesis.

Related Articles

  • Self-Surfing Patients
  • The Amateur Physician
  • Doctors, Patients and Boundaries

Tagged With: Medical decision making, Patients

Related Articles

  • Self-Surfing Patients
  • The Amateur Physician
  • Doctors, Patients and Boundaries

Primary Sidebar

Bryan Vartabedian, MD

Bryan Vartabedian, MD
Bryan Vartabedian is the Chief Pediatrics Officer at Texas Children’s Hospital North Austin and one of health care’s influential
voices on technology & medicine.
Learn More

Popular Articles

  • The Fate of Fired Cleveland Clinic Resident Lara Kollab
  • Cures Act Final Rule – How It Will Change Medicine
  • 12 Things About Doximity You Probably Didn’t Know
  • Should Physicians Give Their Cell Phone Number to Patients?
  • Doximity Dialer Video – Telemedicine’s Latest Power Player

Sign up for 33mail newsletter

Featured Articles

Context Collapse and the Public Physician

Yes, Doctor

Doctors and social media: Damned if you engage, damned if you don’t

Doctors and the Endemic Culture of Permission

100,000 Connected Lemmings

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Footer

What is 33 Charts?

With a mashup of curated and original content that crosses the spaces of digital health, media, communication, technology, patient experience, digital culture, and the humanities, 33 charts offers unique insight and analysis on the changing face of medicine.

Founded in 2009 as a center of community and thought leadership for the issues doctors face in a digital world, 33 charts was included in the National Library of Medicine permanent web archive in 2014.
Learn More

Foci

  • Digital culture
  • Digital Health
  • EHR/Health IT
  • Future Medicine
  • Hospitals
  • Information
  • Patients
  • Physicians
  • Process/Flow
  • Quality
  • Social/Public Media
  • Technology

Copyright © 2023 · 33 Charts · Privacy Policy