• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

33 Charts

  • About
    • What is 33 Charts?
    • Bryan Vartabedian MD
  • Blog
  • 33mail
  • Foci
    • Social/Public Media
    • Physicians
    • Patients
    • Hospitals
    • Information
    • Process/Flow
    • Technology
    • Digital culture
    • Future Medicine
  • The Public Physician
Information, Social/Public Media

Goop Effect – How Outrage Drives Bad Health Information

July 31, 2018 By Bryan Vartabedian · Reading Time: 2 minutes

goop health newsRecently the New York Times unpacked Gwyneth Paltrow’s blockbuster lifestyle brand, Goop. Brilliantly written by Taffy Brodesser-Anker it shows how calculated controversy (generated in part by vagina steaming and coffee enemas) is part of the strategic plan for this 250 million dollar media company. Check out The Guardian follow-up that captures how Goop has built its success on the foundation of ‘hate clicks.’

So how to handle the Goop Effect?

If you’re concerned with the public health of young women you can’t ignore the visibility and influence earned by Goop over the past few years. But despite guerrilla efforts at educating the public on the lack of evidence behind Goop’s wildest health recommendations, the machine continues its content churn. In fact, the more intense the effort to thwart dangerous health advice with evidence, the greater the growth and visibility of the advice. It’s the Goop Effect.

So how do health professionals handle something like this? What is our obligation to get involved?

Engage sponsors in the discussion of responsible journalism

One approach to would be to connect Goop’s sponsors to the site’s health recommendations. This stands the strongest chance of driving more responsible editorial standards. This can begin by drawing on the collective action of digital KOLs and engaged, public physicians. Extremely small individual efforts can scale.

When the public conversation moves from the actions of an organization to the supporters of an organization, accountability becomes more important.

The importance of collective physician participation

Goop’s model of traffic fueled by Paltrow’s ‘cultural storms’ represents something few physicians have ever seen and even fewer can even understand. This is no longer 1999 where information was free and empowering for consumers. The medical community finds itself in really foreign territory.

And all indications are that the Internet will continue to grow as a source of misinformation constructed to manipulate healthcare consumers. As an example, this report from Nieman Lab offers one illustration of how altered video can be used to game unsuspecting consumers. Chilling stuff.

So physicians need to rethink their broader role in the public conversation. Dr. Jen Gunter has set a bold standard for individually exposing medical misinformation. But how physicians use collective social network power to counter something like the Goop Effect needs reappraisal.

The changing role of facts in a post-truth age

The illumination of the truth with evidence has traditionally been a powerful tool for change. However, in the post-truth age we shouldn’t expect medical evidence to move anything other than page views for Goop. Those interested in moving the chains will need a calculated, collective approach that understands the Goop Effect. A strategy that targets the media’s source of energy and goes beyond the visceral emotions of outrage and anger that drive Paltrow’s media model.

Modified photo by Samuel Zeller

Related Articles

  • The Irony of Bad Health Messaging
  • Preemptive Online Health Literacy
  • Your Personal Health Footprint

Tagged With: Goop Effect, Medical Misinformation

Related Articles

  • The Irony of Bad Health Messaging
  • Preemptive Online Health Literacy
  • Your Personal Health Footprint

Primary Sidebar

Bryan Vartabedian, MD

Bryan Vartabedian, MD
Bryan Vartabedian is the Chief Pediatrics Officer at Texas Children’s Hospital North Austin and one of health care’s influential
voices on technology & medicine.
Learn More

Popular Articles

  • The Fate of Fired Cleveland Clinic Resident Lara Kollab
  • Cures Act Final Rule – How It Will Change Medicine
  • 12 Things About Doximity You Probably Didn’t Know
  • Should Physicians Give Their Cell Phone Number to Patients?
  • Doximity Dialer Video – Telemedicine’s Latest Power Player

Sign up for 33mail newsletter

Featured Articles

Doctors and social media: Damned if you engage, damned if you don’t

Yes, Doctor

100,000 Connected Lemmings

The Case for New Physician Literacies in the Digital Age

Reactive and Creative Spaces

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Footer

What is 33 Charts?

With a mashup of curated and original content that crosses the spaces of digital health, media, communication, technology, patient experience, digital culture, and the humanities, 33 charts offers unique insight and analysis on the changing face of medicine.

Founded in 2009 as a center of community and thought leadership for the issues doctors face in a digital world, 33 charts was included in the National Library of Medicine permanent web archive in 2014.
Learn More

Foci

  • Digital culture
  • Digital Health
  • EHR/Health IT
  • Future Medicine
  • Hospitals
  • Information
  • Patients
  • Physicians
  • Process/Flow
  • Quality
  • Social/Public Media
  • Technology

Copyright © 2023 · 33 Charts · Privacy Policy